Spring 2005 :: essays research papers

In the graduation exercise section of essays the authors reason how and wherefore womens liberationist scholars do search is grappled with in each selection. The authors/ libber scholars discuss the importance of query and modeology. Sandra Harding asserts in her essay, Is There a Feminist method? Harding argues that it is difficult to define a distinct feminist method because method and methodological analysis have been intertwined with each other and with epistemological discommodes.(2) Moreover, it is, she argues difficult and potentially dangerous to identify anything as a distinctive methodher careen is that it is not by looking at research methods that one pull up stakes be able to identify distinctive features of the best feminist research methods. In other words it is dangerous to mystify feminist research because it locks researchers, students, scholars and critics into rules and ideas that dont necessarily encompass all facets of feminist cognition and the eff orts that are made to understand it. The idea of there being a single feminist method assumes that there is a single thing, or several concrete things/ideas feminist scholars must be searching for. Hardings argument is supported by authors Greene, Khan in Feminist scholarship and the social construction of women. Greene/Khan assertthat feminist scholarship undertakes the dual task of deconstructing predominately male cultural paradigms and reconstructing a female person perspective and experience in an effort to change the tradition that has inhibit and marginalized usfeminist scholars work to expose and the collusion between political theory and cultural practices. (1) She asserts that there are two premises about gender, the first is, the inequality of the sexes is neither a biological given nor a bode mandate, but a cultural construct, and the second is, the male perspective has henpecked fields of knowledge shaping their paradigms and methods. Here the authors are illustratin g the constraints political orientation and methodology place on feminist research and substantiating the claim that ideology and methodology are emblems of constraint in the feminist discipline because of their global assumptions and dependence on the paradigm for the purposes of legitimizing their claims. The authors, Greene, Khan, Harding, and Cannon all deal with the issue of being tied down to methodology and method that would define feminist work, and solidify its direction while at the same time not allowing it to be fluid enough to evolve as a legitimise academic discipline.As it the issue is raised in Race and twelvemonth Bias in