Emily Dickinson – Death Is a Dialogue

devastation is a Dialogue and If I Can Stop One Heart from breakout Analysis of sound Poetry Of the cardinal poesys both written by Emily Dickinson, Death is a Dialogue and If I Can Stop One Heart from jailbreak, the first is one that a qualified ref would say is a good meter and the south is one a qualified reader would call a bad rime. The befriend meter possesses one of the triplet varieties of inferior poetry. Alternatively, Death is a Dialogue possesses poetic devices that establish it as a superior work of literature.First, both poems have a standardized central settle. In Death is a Dialogue, the central persona is to convey a perspective about the spirit and the afterlife. In If I Can Stop One Heart from Breaking, the central purpose is that by helping others, life becomes purposeful. However, the first poem is superior to the second poem. The first poem depicts the human spirit as something that is without end. The first poem has more poetical merit than th e second poem in the persona of imagery, symbolism, and personification.The poem is structured as a dialogue alongside a gang of personification and apostrophe. Used together, these literary devices give life and imperativeness to the language of the poem as seen in Dickinsons first poem. The reader is provoked to think of abstract concepts of Death and the tenderness as thinking, aspect, and intercommunicate like human beings. The riding habit of personification is run aground in the second and terzetto lines Dissolve says Death The Spirit Sir / I have some other trust . Death and the Spirit are also personified physically, as found in line two of stanza two The Spirit turns away. The combination of these poetic devices creates a subtle but creative ironic tone. Since the poem depicts a dialogue between nonhuman entities that are in unlikeness about the immorality of the Spirit, personifying them gives them the qualities of life that suggests that the soul is immortal . The cultivation two lines of the second stanza are symbolic and open to interpretation.By leaving the virtually difficult concepts of the poem until the end is an effective way of engaging the reader because the purpose of the poem cannot be fully achieved without interpreting these lines. This also flora effectively because the fashion model of the poem provides enough information to consider how the last two lines achieve the poems purpose. For example, the contradictory tone of the framework creates a dramatic reading experience. It transits between resilience and fear, where the Spirit portrays resilience, for example, in the last line of stanza one I have another Trust (p 223).In the last two lines of stanza two, Just laying off for certify / An Overcoat of Clay (p 223), is highly symbolic and achieves the purpose of the poem because tomography the spirit taking off an Overcoat of Clay creatively shows that it is immortal the precisely buried part of him is his overc oat. Overcoat is an effective use of connotation as it conjures a strong mental image of the Spirit proving his immortality. By comparison, If I Can Stop One Heart from Breaking, is an inferior poem.The poem is didactic and uses simple language that is not theatre of operations to interpretation, leaving a dull reading experience. Its message is clear, but how the poem attempts to achieve its message is poorly done. For example, the rhythm of the poem does not erect to the purpose of the poem because it only gives the poem a superficial and wily tone that an unqualified reader would find large-hearted and poetic. Rhyme is employ for its own sake. A good example of this is in the first and third lines where the words breaking and aching are used.The lack of literary devices such as personification and connotation leave a poem that has only face value with no incentive or encouragement to keep open beyond the literal convey of the words. It is purely didactic in that its prim ary feather purpose is to preach or teach a good poem would achieve this purpose by being subtle. This poem would be appealing to unqualified or beginner readers whom are looking for a vigorous truth dressed up in pretty words. Ultimately, the poem leaves the reader with a sermon and lacking both creativity and originality.It presents an inspirational theme, but does not leave a qualified reader with a feeling of inspiration. Overall, this is a bad poem because it uses literary devices that are superficial, such as rhyming. As well, there is a lack of literary devices which otherwise could sue the poems purpose (to make it inspirational on a higher level). For example, the reader is not provoked to think about either larger or hidden meaning in the poem. Unlike Death is a Dialogue which provokes both insight to a larger meaning beyond its face value, this poems flaws largely outweigh any positive features a good poem would have.